Re: New addition to the Bachuil group
Posted: Sat Aug 08, 2020 3:50 am
Hi George,
There are several marker result differences with the Mr. Fraser Y DNA results and those of some of the Livingstons in the Bachuil Group but for the most part quite similar. I have not seen any really close Y DNA matches of Livingstons in the Bachuil Livingston group but the Y DNA marker by marker results I am thinking is quite similar. That SNP sequence of SNP's and subclades that was listed with that group of Scots with the Bachuil Livingstone does not make sense to me if Mr. Fraser is positive for SNP L764 and there is only 5 or six markers difference between Mr. Fraser and the Bachuil Livingstone.
Sorry that SNP sequence of Subclades of L1335 listed I earlier referred to with that group of Scottish men listed with the one Bachuil Livingstone said to be L1335>L1065 completely confused me and led me in the wrong direction. I think with the relatively close marker matches with exception of apparently several marker differences or something like that with some of Bachuil Livingtones and Mr. Ferguson makes me now think that the Bachuil Livingstone group could all be likely positive for a subclade S764 and perhaps even relatively close with Subclade results with Mr. Ferguson. In the mean time as I said will just have to wait until we hopefully have confirmation that a Bachuil Livingstone has done the SNP test and see if that results in somewhat similar result to that of Mr. Fraser. In the case of the Parker Livingstons whose results I am quite familiar with one of the closest "other" Argyllshire family matches is with a Ferguson. There are a number unrelated Ferguson families according to their y DNA testing but some of an old Argyllshire Ferguson family group that resided in Argyllshire is clearly matching with the Livingstones matching with the Parker Livingstone Group. Not a super close Y DNA match with the Bachuil Livingstones but my guess is that the SNP results as may be somewhat similar. I guess only time and testing will tell. Not much point I guess in speculating further on my part and I will just let the Livingstone SNP results speak for themselves when that happens.
regards,
Donald
There are several marker result differences with the Mr. Fraser Y DNA results and those of some of the Livingstons in the Bachuil Group but for the most part quite similar. I have not seen any really close Y DNA matches of Livingstons in the Bachuil Livingston group but the Y DNA marker by marker results I am thinking is quite similar. That SNP sequence of SNP's and subclades that was listed with that group of Scots with the Bachuil Livingstone does not make sense to me if Mr. Fraser is positive for SNP L764 and there is only 5 or six markers difference between Mr. Fraser and the Bachuil Livingstone.
Sorry that SNP sequence of Subclades of L1335 listed I earlier referred to with that group of Scottish men listed with the one Bachuil Livingstone said to be L1335>L1065 completely confused me and led me in the wrong direction. I think with the relatively close marker matches with exception of apparently several marker differences or something like that with some of Bachuil Livingtones and Mr. Ferguson makes me now think that the Bachuil Livingstone group could all be likely positive for a subclade S764 and perhaps even relatively close with Subclade results with Mr. Ferguson. In the mean time as I said will just have to wait until we hopefully have confirmation that a Bachuil Livingstone has done the SNP test and see if that results in somewhat similar result to that of Mr. Fraser. In the case of the Parker Livingstons whose results I am quite familiar with one of the closest "other" Argyllshire family matches is with a Ferguson. There are a number unrelated Ferguson families according to their y DNA testing but some of an old Argyllshire Ferguson family group that resided in Argyllshire is clearly matching with the Livingstones matching with the Parker Livingstone Group. Not a super close Y DNA match with the Bachuil Livingstones but my guess is that the SNP results as may be somewhat similar. I guess only time and testing will tell. Not much point I guess in speculating further on my part and I will just let the Livingstone SNP results speak for themselves when that happens.
regards,
Donald